This pack is for the Finance & Reporting team only.
Enter your team code to unlock.
Aurora Nexus Global is a mid-sized financial services group operating across Malaysia and the APAC region. The Finance division manages Group financial planning, performance reporting, and Board-level communication. The team produces the monthly management pack reviewed by the Board of Directors and Group EXCO every cycle, but the process behind it is consuming more time than the output is worth.
Every month, Aurora Nexus Global's finance team runs what they call the "Excel Marathon": five days of manual data collection, consolidation, and reconciliation before a single line of analysis can begin. By the time the numbers are clean, analysts have one day left to write the Board narrative and build the presentation.
The root cause is fragmentation. Each of ANG's eight business units submits monthly numbers in slightly different Excel formats, with different column labels, different assumption bases, and varying definitions of core metrics. Finance analysts reconcile these by hand, chasing queries over email and Teams, often receiving updated files hours before the deadline.
When a number changes, and it always does, the analyst must hunt through email threads to find verbal approval, update multiple files manually, and hope nothing cascades. The Board presentation has gone to print with incorrect figures twice in the past year. Both times, the error was caught in the meeting itself.
| Report ID | Business Unit | Metric | Initial Value | Final Value | Reason | Approved Via | Documented? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RPT-501 | Consumer Banking | Revenue | RM 142.3M | RM 138.9M | Late fee waiver | No | |
| RPT-502 | SME Banking | OPEX | RM 28.4M | RM 31.2M | Headcount accrual | Teams chat | No |
| RPT-503 | Treasury | Net Interest Income | RM 67.1M | RM 69.8M | Rate restatement | Verbal | No |
| RPT-504 | Islamic Banking | Financing Revenue | RM 44.6M | RM 44.6M | No change | N/A | Yes |
| RPT-505 | Corporate Banking | COGS | RM 19.8M | RM 22.1M | FX impact | Partial | |
| RPT-506 | Digital Banking | OPEX | RM 11.2M | RM 13.5M | Capitalisation reversal | No | |
| RPT-507 | Consumer Banking | Credit Loss Provision | RM 8.9M | RM 11.4M | Portfolio reclass | No | |
| RPT-508 | SME Banking | Revenue | RM 89.3M | RM 86.7M | Delayed drawdown | Teams chat | No |
| RPT-509 | Treasury | OPEX | RM 5.6M | RM 5.6M | No change | N/A | Yes |
| RPT-510 | Islamic Banking | OPEX | RM 17.4M | RM 19.0M | Zakat accrual | Partial | |
| RPT-511 | Corporate Banking | Revenue | RM 55.2M | RM 51.8M | Contract restructure | Verbal | No |
| RPT-512 | Digital Banking | Revenue | RM 6.1M | RM 6.1M | No change | N/A | Yes |
I received three separate "final" versions of the Consumer Banking revenue slide yesterday. Each had a different number. The version that went to the Board printer was not the most recent one.
The problem is not the people. The problem is the process. We have no single source of truth, no version control, and no documented trail for why numbers change. When a Board member asks me why revenue moved between the draft and the final, I should have a precise answer in 30 seconds, not spend 20 minutes searching email threads. I need a solution. Not a workaround.
Identify which types of adjustments and process failures are most damaging to reporting confidence, and what the patterns in the data suggest about where the breakdown is systemic versus one-off.
Design an ideal reporting process for Aurora Nexus Global where every number change is traceable, every adjustment is documented, and the CFO can answer any Board question within minutes.
Recommend how ANG can reduce the time spent gathering and reconciling data, and what the freed capacity should be redirected toward.
Your working folder contains 2 files for your team:
Opens in OneDrive. Use Incognito / InPrivate mode.
Power Ups are your next step โ take what you built today and think about how to bring it back to your real work at Alliance Bank.
Complete your challenge tasks first, then unlock them here.
You have used Copilot to solve a scenario. Now bring it back to your real work at Alliance Bank.
In Tasks 1 and 2, you found that the biggest threats to reporting confidence are recurring manual adjustments with no audit trail and data gathered from systems that do not share the same definitions. You then designed a traceable reporting process that makes assumptions visible and verifiable. Alliance Bank's Finance and Reporting teams carry the same risk every close cycle.
Use cases from finance and reporting teams at banks like yours. React to these: swap, add, or keep.
As a team, pick your top 3, then paste this into Copilot:
Your winning use case needs a great prompt. Paste this into Copilot:
Test it. Refine it. Make it yours.
Draft your adoption pitch: