This pack is for the Strategy & Change Communications team only.
Enter your team code to unlock.
Aurora Nexus Global is mid-way through the most significant strategic transformation in its history. Project Nexus 2027 is ANG's group-wide programme to modernise core infrastructure, accelerate digital growth, and redesign the operating model for the next phase of its APAC expansion. The Group Strategy and Transformation team leads the programme design and roadmap, with Group Digital and Information providing the technology backbone. Their shared mandate is to ensure that every part of the business understands what is changing, why it is changing, and what they need to do differently starting now.
Project Nexus 2027 launched in Q1 2025 with three flagship initiatives: core banking modernisation, a digital customer acquisition push, and an enterprise-wide operating model redesign. Each initiative had its own project team, its own town hall deck, and its own communications cadence. What none of them had was a single master narrative connecting all three into one coherent story. By the time divisional briefings were delivered, the framing had already drifted. Consumer Banking heard a growth story. Operations heard a cost-efficiency story. The Wealth Management division received no formal briefing at all, and found out about Nexus through forwarded slide decks. Three initiatives, ten divisions, no shared vocabulary: this is not a communications programme, it is a recipe for confusion at scale.
The consequences are measurable. ANG's Q1 2025 employee sentiment survey recorded that 42% of staff say they do not understand what Project Nexus means for their role. Middle managers are the most confused cohort. In focus groups, managers reported receiving conflicting guidance: some were told their team structure would not change; others in equivalent roles across different divisions were told restructuring was coming. EXCO has been fielding escalation calls directly because managers do not know who else to ask. The communications infrastructure designed to prevent this problem is the infrastructure that created it.
The root cause is not a weak strategy. The Nexus 2027 roadmap is well-defined and well-funded. The root cause is the translation layer between strategy and the people who execute it. Three separate communications approaches, four internal sponsors, and no single gatekeeper for message consistency means each initiative is running its own change programme in parallel. Employees receive fragments of the story rather than the story itself. The Alliance Islamic business received no formal communication at all and still logged 78 confusion-related queries. These are not communication gaps. They are governance failures presenting themselves as a messaging problem.
| Initiative Name | Division | Communication Channel | Message Sent Date | Employees Reached | Confusion Tickets Raised | Escalated to EXCO | Aligned with Master Narrative? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Core Banking Modernisation | Technology | Town Hall + Email | 15 Jan 2025 | 420 | 34 | Yes | Partial |
| Digital Acquisition Push | Consumer Banking | Town Hall | 18 Jan 2025 | 680 | 51 | Yes | No |
| Operating Model Redesign | Group Operations | Email Only | 22 Jan 2025 | 510 | 89 | Yes | No |
| Core Banking Modernisation | Finance | Slide Deck (emailed) | 5 Feb 2025 | 180 | 22 | No | Partial |
| Digital Acquisition Push | SME Banking | Manager Briefing | 10 Feb 2025 | 210 | 47 | Yes | No |
| Operating Model Redesign | HR | Town Hall | 14 Feb 2025 | 270 | 31 | No | Partial |
| Core Banking Modernisation | Risk and Compliance | Email Only | 19 Feb 2025 | 150 | 18 | No | Yes |
| Digital Acquisition Push | Wealth Management | None (not reached) | N/A | 0 | 63 | Yes | N/A |
| Operating Model Redesign | Treasury | Slide Deck (emailed) | 28 Feb 2025 | 90 | 14 | No | Partial |
| Core Banking Modernisation | Retail Branches | Manager Cascade | 7 Mar 2025 | 940 | 112 | Yes | No |
| Digital Acquisition Push | Digital Team | Internal Briefing | 12 Mar 2025 | 130 | 9 | No | Yes |
| Operating Model Redesign | Alliance Islamic | No Communication Sent | N/A | 0 | 78 | Yes | N/A |
I want to be direct before the next EXCO review. The communications strategy for Project Nexus is not working, and the gap between what we believe employees understand and what they actually understand is significant. Our Q1 sentiment data shows 42% of staff cannot connect Nexus to their own role. In the Retail Branches alone, 112 confusion-related queries were raised after the manager cascade, more than any other channel we deployed. We have three initiatives running in parallel, each with its own voice, its own sponsor, and its own slide deck. Employees are receiving three partial stories, not one complete one, and the effect is compounding with every new wave of communication.
The more immediate problem is what this is doing to middle managers. They are the critical relay layer for this transformation, and right now they are being asked to answer questions they were never equipped to answer. Several have escalated directly to EXCO not because the strategy is wrong, but because they received conflicting guidance on what Nexus means for their specific teams. I am recommending that we pause all divisional communications for 30 days, consolidate the three initiative narratives into a single Nexus story, and give every manager a one-page briefing guide before the next wave goes out.
Using the communications data provided, identify where Project Nexus messaging is breaking down most severely. Which initiatives, divisions, and channels are generating the highest confusion? What is the common thread across the highest-confusion events? Use Copilot to identify patterns across the dataset, flag the combinations of initiative, channel, and division that carry the most risk, and quantify how many employees have been reached with a message that conflicts with the master narrative.
What does a unified change communications model for Project Nexus 2027 look like? Define the master narrative structure, the governance model for message approval, and what a well-equipped manager briefing pack must contain. Use Copilot to help you build a communications architecture that can serve all three initiatives, adapt to different audiences without losing consistency, and be governed by a single narrative owner rather than a committee.
Identify the three most important structural changes ANG must make in the next 90 days to move from fragmented messaging to one unified Nexus narrative. Define what "communications aligned" looks like as a measurable outcome. Use Copilot to draft a 90-day communications recovery plan that EXCO could approve and track, including a proposed narrative owner role, a message governance process, and a manager enablement sprint.
Your working folder contains 2 files for your team:
Opens in OneDrive. Use Incognito / InPrivate mode.
Power Ups are your next step — take what you built today and think about how to bring it back to your real work at Alliance Bank.
Complete your challenge tasks first, then unlock them here.
You have used Copilot to solve a scenario. Now bring it back to your real work at Alliance Bank.
In Tasks 1 and 2, you found that the core problem is not the strategy but the translation layer. Different sponsors, different decks, different timing, and no single narrative owner produces a different impression of the same programme in every part of the business. You then designed a governance model and a unified communications architecture to fix it. Alliance Bank's Strategy and Communications teams face this challenge every time a major programme or policy change launches.
Use cases from strategy and change communications teams at banks like yours. React to these: swap, add, or keep.
As a team, pick your top 3, then paste this into Copilot:
Your winning use case needs a great prompt. Paste this into Copilot:
Test it. Refine it. Make it yours.
Draft your adoption pitch: